CARDINAL SPACES
  • HOME
    • Summer School 18
    • School Improvement Plan >
      • The 5 Rs
      • Late Start 17-18
    • Title I Programs
  • HANDBOOK
    • Schedules
    • Teacher Evaluation >
      • Mentor Report
    • Building Leadership Team
    • Faculty Meetings
    • Professional Development >
      • GrowthMindset PD
    • Videos 16-17
    • DCMS Work Order Form
  • TEAMING
    • Team Leaders
    • Conferences Schedules
    • Team Agendas
    • Advisory >
      • Growth Mindset
    • Spring Conferences 18
  • PLC LEADERS
    • Explorers PLC 17-18
    • 8TH Grade PLC 17-18
    • 7TH Grade PLC 17-18
    • 6TH Grade PLC 17-18
  • TESTING
    • Kansas Assessment Guide
    • Writing Assessment
    • MDPT
  • INSTRUCTION
    • Curriculum Guides
    • Thinking Maps
    • Checking for Understanding
    • Formative Assessment
    • Accountable Talk
    • Teach Like A Pirate
    • 5 Kinds of Thinking
    • Math Practices
    • Technology
  • SIT

Checking for Understanding Level I Oral Language

This page is designed to provide resources in developing and selecting instructional strategies for academic discourse. At the bottom of the page you will find a list of pdf resources you can choose when developing deep learning events in your lesson plans or unit.

Back to Infographic Home Page

Deep Learning Accountable Talk

Picture
To define deep learning accountable talk, oral conversations must occur between individuals to support clarification of different points of view. These deep learning discourses are defined in ways teachers hold students accountable for focused conversations. 

To qualify for accountable talk teachers design strategies focus on promoting deep learning criteria as  clarity is defined in ways students are making contributions to the learning community. For academic conversations to be considered accountable the academic discourse must meet three criteria 1.) the discourse must provide accurate knowledge, 2.) make contributions to the learning community, 3.) and promote rigorous thinking. To characterize accountable talk in high engaged classrooms is in the way a teacher structures classroom norms to promote conversational rigor. These norms are directly associated with scaffold expectations prompting open ended responses either in direct instruction or student reflective discussions.   

Student to Student Accountable Talk
But not all classroom discussions sustain deep learning accountable talk. The teacher must also consider classroom participation standards. Teachers by design must go beyond the three criteria for academic discourse by clarifying the norms for student to student participation. To meet the accountable talk student participation standards the a teacher must provide clarity for both speaking and listening. The following criteria provides evidence when identifying student to student accountable talk. 

  • There is evidence of a relationship between the discussion and the stated learning objectives. 
  • Students design conversational questions requiring higher order thinking (synthesis, analysis, evaluation, problem solving, application of learning)
  • Students have a deep understanding of the importance of text features.
  • Students understand the importance of data resources when supporting their positioning in academic conversation.
  • A set of agreed upon norms for academic discourse are explained by the teacher and are scaffold for clarity.
  • Norms for accountable talk are posted for all students to see and follow.
Teacher to Student Accountable Talk
Accountable talk can also occur in direct instruction as long as the teacher to student discourse goes beyond surface learning. To move away from surface learning discussions a teacher must understand the effectiveness of question design. Traditionally when teachers are engaging students in direct instruction they use patterns of paraphrasing statements giving consistent feedback to individual students responses.But using direct questioning prompts which provide outlets for fixed answers cannot be considered accountable talk. Too many fixed questions can can actually stifle academic discourse.  

The typical teacher initiated questions are primarily designed as knowledge level questions. This type of questioning pattern is referred to as (IRE) initiate a fixed answer question, responds by paraphrasing the statement, and then evaluates the level of correctness by using yes or no feedback. The IRE patterns of fixed questioning  may reveal correct answers but does not build deep learning nearly as well as open-ended oral discourse. 
Accountable talk for deep learning during direct instruction is established when the teacher ask clarify questions. Examples of accountable talk initiated by teacher questions include statements like, "Why do you think that?" Or, "What's your reasoning behind that explanation?" , "Did everyone hear what Bill said and can someone clarify his statement by giving an example?" "Could anyone repeat what Beth said so everyone we can recognize her contribution?" "Does anyone agree or disagree?" "Does anyone want to contribute additional thoughts to Johns statement?" Teachers who aim at designing accountable talk discourses in their classrooms are established by using the following criteria: 
  • A student can provide explanation of a teacher initiated question by stating the purpose of the question as it relates to the objective. 
  • The teacher emphasizes the importance of the objective as a technique to redirect discussions when needed. 
  • The teacher ask open ended questions requiring higher order thinking (synthesis, analysis, evaluation, problem solving, application of learning) 
  • The teacher provides corrective feedback when needed to give clarity to accountable talk. 

Resources

Accountable Talk Toolkit (Lesson Examples)
Constructive Conversation (Negotiate, Fortify, Create, Clarify)
Language Strategy Stems for Academic Instruction
Structures for Academic Talk (methods for engaging academic discourse)
Accountable Talk Knowledge Defined
Academic Conversation Highlights by Zwiers & Crawford
Accountable Talk Learning Community Defined
Accountable Talk Rigorous Thinking Defined
ORC Non-Discrimination Statement
USDA Non-Discrimination Statement
USD 443 does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, military status, primary language, and/or disability.  This non-discrimination policy applies to admission, employment, programs, activities, and providing equal access to Boy Scouts and other designated youth groups.  A lack of English language skills will not be a barrier to admission and participation in the Career and Technical (vocational) and/or other educational programs of the school. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Secondary Schools, Dr. Glenn Fortmayer; The Learning Center, 308 West Frontview, Dodge City, KS 67801, (620) 227-1763.


USD 443 no discrimina por motivos de raza , color, origen nacional, sexo , edad, religión , estado militar , idioma principal , y / o discapacidad . Esta política de no discriminación se aplica a la admisión , el empleo , programas , actividades , y el acceso equitativo a los Boy Scouts y otros grupos juveniles designados . La falta de conocimientos del idioma inglés no será una barrera para la admisión y participación en la Carrera y Técnica ( profesional) y / u otros programas educativos de la escuela . La siguiente persona ha sido designada para manejar las preguntas relativas a las políticas de, MS. Escuelas secundarias, el Dr. Glenn Fortmayer; The Learning Center (El Centro de Aprendizaje), 308 West Frontview, Dodge City, KS,67801, (620) 227-1763

✕